Adding BrokerProperties when sending message to queue or topic #1693
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Gaelik-git
force-pushed
the
adding_brokerproperties_when_sending_message
branch
from
c273ebe
to
0ad3151
Compare
heaths
requested changes
Jul 2, 2024
heaths
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
Gaelik-git
force-pushed
the
adding_brokerproperties_when_sending_message
branch
from
ad74529
to
2c62d42
Compare
|
Everything should be ready, thanks for the feedback |
heaths
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2024
|
Thank you for making the requested changes! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following this documentation : https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/servicebus/message-headers-and-properties#message-headers
I would like the possibility to set an ScheduledEnqueueTimeUtc (other option could be added in the future)
I updated the existing send_message method, making to modification a breaking change. Do you think it's ok like this ?
Should I create a new method for sending messages with options set ?
Thanks