Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C++ Guidelines - Add a concept of the ::Models namespace where response types need to live #2010

Closed
ahsonkhan opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
ArchBoard Guidelines Apply to PRs or Issues relating Archboard Guidelines architecture C++ C++ Language

Comments

@ahsonkhan
Copy link
Contributor

You can look at .NET's guidelines as an example:

https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/dotnet_introduction.html#dotnet-service-models-namespace

YOU MAY place output model types in .Models subnamespace to avoid cluttering the main namespace with too many types.
It is important for the main namespace of a client library to be clutter free.

cc @RickWinter, @CaseyCarter, @tg-msft

@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan added architecture C++ C++ Language labels Nov 10, 2020
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan added this to the [2020] December milestone Nov 10, 2020
@RickWinter RickWinter added ArchBoard Guidelines Apply to PRs or Issues relating Archboard Guidelines and removed architecture labels Dec 18, 2020
@RickWinter RickWinter removed this from the [2020] December milestone Jun 8, 2023
Copy link

Hi @ahsonkhan, we deeply appreciate your input into this project. Regrettably, this issue has remained inactive for over 2 years, leading us to the decision to close it. We've implemented this policy to maintain the relevance of our issue queue and facilitate easier navigation for new contributors. If you still believe this topic requires attention, please feel free to create a new issue, referencing this one. Thank you for your understanding and ongoing support.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
ArchBoard Guidelines Apply to PRs or Issues relating Archboard Guidelines architecture C++ C++ Language
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants