You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We are using Azure Security Benchmark which includes the policy Storage accounts should use private link, which we'd like to disable for a specific set of our sub-resources. These resources are recognizable both by their name, which contains tfstate or their resource group name, that also contains tfstate.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd love support for wildcars for the scope(s) segment of an exemptions definition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nikolaifa
changed the title
Support for wildcars for the scope(s) segment of an exemptions definition
Support for wildcars in the scope(s) segment of an exemptions definition
Jun 24, 2024
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We are using Azure Security Benchmark which includes the policy
Storage accounts should use private link
, which we'd like to disable for a specific set of our sub-resources. These resources are recognizable both by their name, which containstfstate
or their resource group name, that also containstfstate
.Describe the solution you'd like
I'd love support for wildcars for the scope(s) segment of an exemptions definition.
E.g.:
AB#44041
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: