Readability Problems

[BelfordZ]

3.) Names that base on hashes can become very hard to read in my opinion. Especially when we have Replaces and Superseded-by as hashes. I suggest we add a short title to it e.g. *IP-{title}-{8_bytes_hash}

Originally posted by @phyro in #2 (comment)

[ghost]

I think that, applied to ECIP, a format like

ECIP-06feed87-BlockGasReduction can be standardized.

*IP-{8_bytes_hash}-{title}

[phyro]

Copying my response from the discord:

it'd put title first because it doesn't change for the machine and is easier for a human to read. Also, sorting them can group different versions of the same proposal

[YazzyYaz]

I think some sort of standard is good for human readability:

1. ECIP-{NUMBER}-{NAME}
2. ECIP-{HASH}

So, original ECIP-{HASH} idea can reference an ECIP-{NUMBER}-{NAME} that is externally referenced and marketed to the community.

I guarantee that no one is gonna remember a hash number or they'll even make mistakes typing it, so if it can tie in a DNS way to a naming convention and an external numbering reference, might be easiest.

[phyro]

another idea if we want to have easy ipfs links: ECIP-{title}-{IPFS hash of file content}