-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Firefox support #166
Comments
Context on why I think so: wtransport/wtransport/src/endpoint.rs Lines 668 to 670 in 4b25852
Maybe latest FF needs something else... |
I was able to connect with Of course, as already mentioned in the parent issue, Firefox does not support I understand OP says Google Chrome works with the same certificate, did they set the correct anchors on FF? Would it be possible to have
|
Yes, on the second thought, this is most likely due to the lack of the trust to server certificate by FF. It works when set up properly without the |
Actually, Firefox should support See the meta bug at their tracker: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1709355 Here's the (second) fix for the Apparently the still didn't get it right |
I'm getting the "WebTransport connection rejected" intermittently, retrying fixes it but it's annoying :/ |
Testing with Firefox Sporadically I get:
(in the webclient). This is not related to Note: The issue is not always reproducible. By protocol packets inspection, it seems Firefox closes the session stream right after wtransport server logs:
And network inspection:
In short, Firefox close the session stream (0) right after receiving the Considering this only happens sometimes, it might not be a missing protocol feature required by Firefox |
Current If anyone can test and provide feedback to me it would be great so I can enforce a new release |
Yep, it fixes the issue! Thanks! |
Hi, I was wondering if there were any caveats/special handling that is needed for Firefox support.
I've had an issue where WebTransport connections get rejected on Firefox.
It doesn't seem to be certificate-related, since the exact same code/certificate works on google chrome.
@MOZGIII suggested that it might be on the server side.
I quote:
Maybe you have more information?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: