You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2020. It is now read-only.
I'd like to use the Task pattern in projects where I don't need AppLinks.
e.g. split Bolts into 2 modules:
Bolts/Tasks
Bolts/AppLinks // Depends on Tasks
Publish Bolts/AppLinks with the same Maven identifiers as currently used.
If desired AppLinks could further be split, into a part which does not rely on tasks and another that does:
Bolts/AppLinks
Bolts/Tasks
Bolts/AppLinksTasks // Depends on Tasks and AppLinks
With Bolts/AppLinks containing the core model, and Bolts/AppLinksTasks (or Bolts/AppLinksResolver).
Publish Bolts/AppLinksTasks with the same Maven identifiers as currently used.
If you're open to the idea I can submit a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
right now we're under bolts-android. would anyone have issues to moving Tasks to bolts-tasks and AppLinks to bolts-applinks as opposed to bolts-android-tasks and bolts-android-applinks? bolts-android could still be the umbrella for both Tasks and AppLinks.
I'd like to use the Task pattern in projects where I don't need AppLinks.
e.g. split Bolts into 2 modules:
Publish Bolts/AppLinks with the same Maven identifiers as currently used.
If desired AppLinks could further be split, into a part which does not rely on tasks and another that does:
With Bolts/AppLinks containing the core model, and Bolts/AppLinksTasks (or Bolts/AppLinksResolver).
Publish Bolts/AppLinksTasks with the same Maven identifiers as currently used.
If you're open to the idea I can submit a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: