Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: Field to validate model creation for lorawan #286

Closed
kbeaugrand opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #290
Closed

Bug: Field to validate model creation for lorawan #286

kbeaugrand opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #290
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@kbeaugrand
Copy link
Member

Expected Behavior

When creating a lorawan device model (empty).

Current Behavior

It creates the device model but failed when posting commands (Empty) with http 404 issue.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a new device model
  2. Select LoraWAN
  3. On LoRaWAN tab, set the OTAA APPE EUI
  4. Click to save

Logs

image

Additional Information

It seems that it miss the model id on the command post Url.

@kbeaugrand kbeaugrand added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 21, 2022
@kbeaugrand kbeaugrand added this to the S12 milestone Feb 21, 2022
@kbeaugrand kbeaugrand moved this to :pencil: Todo in IoT Hub Portal Feb 21, 2022
@Sben65 Sben65 self-assigned this Feb 21, 2022
@Sben65 Sben65 moved this from :pencil: Todo to :construction: In Progress in IoT Hub Portal Feb 21, 2022
Sben65 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2022
@Sben65 Sben65 linked a pull request Feb 21, 2022 that will close this issue
9 tasks
kbeaugrand pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2022
@kbeaugrand kbeaugrand moved this from :construction: In Progress to :rocket: Ready in IoT Hub Portal Feb 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Status: 🚀 Ready
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants