Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implicit coercions #701

Closed
mark-koch opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #702 · May be fixed by #655
Closed

Implicit coercions #701

mark-koch opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #702 · May be fixed by #655
Assignees
@mark-koch
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mark-koch
Copy link
Collaborator

mark-koch commented Dec 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Currently, implicit coercions are implemented by CustomCallCheckers on arithmetic functions and don't work for all cases. The type checker should understand arithmetic coercions natively.

This will unblock #464 and #663.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mark-koch mark-koch

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@mark-koch