Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[doc] Is CosmWasm Contract Semantics decument outdated? #1724

Open
lshoo opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

[doc] Is CosmWasm Contract Semantics decument outdated? #1724

lshoo opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@lshoo
Copy link

lshoo commented Jun 15, 2023

Hi,
I have noticed that the Response struct in the Contract Semantics document still includes the submessages field but does not have the events field, while in the source code of CosmWasm std 1.2.6 version, the submessages field has been removed and the events field has been added. new Response code
Is the document outdated or I miss something?

@chipshort
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, that is outdated (though it doesn't matter much for the semantics). submessages is now messages and events was added.
Feel free to open a PR for this.

On another note, it looks like the "append to a default event" link also rotted. At the time, it was pointing here and looks like in the latest code, that functionality is living here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants