Fix SudoContractProposal and ExecuteContractProposal

[the-frey]

Follow up fix for #730

Add missing SudoContractProposal and ExecuteContractProposal where it was missinng in types/codec and basic validation unit test.

Could be some more to this that I've missed.

[the-frey]

Will also be running some manual tests tomorrow to check if this resolves the issues we've seen with gov/sudo.

EDIT: 🚀

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #808 (190b8cc) into main (57ead1a) will increase coverage by 0.54%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #808      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.76%   59.31%   +0.54%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        5862     5896      +34     
==========================================
+ Hits         3445     3497      +52     
+ Misses       2164     2145      -19     
- Partials      253      254       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
x/wasm/types/codec.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
x/wasm/types/test_fixtures.go	95.61% <100.00%> (+0.66%)	⬆️
x/wasm/types/proposal.go	69.05% <0.00%> (+5.86%)	⬆️

[the-frey]

Update: we have run this on a testnet with a sudo contract and successfully moved funds via a gov prop. Our auto-CI hook that was failing with 0.25.0 also passes when we substitute in this branch, so we're pretty confident it's the fix.

[maurolacy]

LGTM. Perhaps @alpe wants to take a look.

[pinosu]

lgtm. 👍
I added just some minor comments.
Also it would be nice if you could update the description mentioning that also ExecuteContractProposal was added.

[the-frey]

@pinosu have updated the description and some additional test cases as you suggested.

[ethanfrey]

Good find. I have a mental block with amino. Can't believe we still need to register all this stuff.