-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename "Language Agnostic"? #5249
Comments
I think renaming it to "By Topic" would be great based on what's currently there as it lists specific concepts such as "Algorithms and Data Structures" and "Cloud Computing" |
Just to clarify, do you mean like?
As the table of contents, and the body of the document reflecting this structure? |
Yes |
I'd be a fan of this change then personally. |
As a new contributor, I find the category "Language Agnostic" confusing. I've been wondering where to place Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programming, which is about programming in general but uses Scheme in it examples, similar to How to Design Programs, which is listed under "Software Architecture" but uses Racket (a dialect of Scheme) in its examples. |
SICP is in "Theoretical Computer Science" - we have SEVEN versions. The new contributor perspective is really valuable; MAYbe MAY is a good time to do this. |
My bad, I searched on the author name, not on the title. I would not have expected it under Theoretical Computer Science, but I have no excuse for not searching. 😳 For what little it's worth, I like the proposal to split up the list by language and by topic. I would want to know whether it's okay to put a given book into both lists. |
As a contributor I like @SethFalco suggestion. I think that something like that "miscellanea" would be great too. |
Absolute newbie here: how about something similar such as "language independent"? |
Based on the categories in "Language Agnostic", I'm thinking it would be better to call it "By Topic" or "By Subject" and create "By Language" for the rest. This could be also be a useful way to split the too-long books list into two files.
Opinions/ Feedback?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: