Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

suggestion: Label for resources which are created or supported by the open-source community. #9433

Closed
ghost opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
stale: closed Requests closed due to don't have recent interaction (Out-of-Date) stale Requests that have not had recent interaction (Out-of-Date)

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 13, 2023

Situation

Resources, like books are hosted on GitHub as a repository.

Aim

To give credit to the various contributors and to add an appropriate "author" for the book or resource.

Suggestion

Case 1: The community is the sole creator.

There are cases where the community is developing a book or resource with various different authors for different chapters or even sections. In these cases, adding the author name becomes a tedious task as there is no clear author. For cases like this, I propose that we add a label stating that the work is created by the community.

For example, we may do something like:

  • [An Awesome Community Driven Open-Source Book](Link To The Book) - 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 created by community (File Type 1, File Type 2...)

Real life examples where this is helpful:

In the above two cases, a large community is creating the work.

Case 2: The community is supporting the author(s).

This is a common case now, where the authors are hosting their work on GitHub. For this situation, I propose adding the label after the author name.

For example:

  • [An Awesome Book Supported By Community](Link To The Book) - Author Name, 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 supported by community (File Type 1, File Type 2...)

Real life examples where this is helpful:

Note: I am not at all rigid in the ways I have suggested. More subtle ways would be more helpful. I request feedback from everybody.

@eshellman
Copy link
Collaborator

Case 1 - interesting suggestion. I worry about emojis in the creator field (note that our search box has to parse out creator names (free-programming-books-search). Take a look at #7034

Case 2 - this has been suggested before, but in practice it's too hard to maintain, verify, and avoid abuse

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jul 14, 2023

Case 1 - Yes sir. I worry about the emojis too. Some other subtle way would be helpful.
Case 2 - This one is a real issue sir. Let's see what others suggest.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity during last 60 days 😴

It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, remove stale label or add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Requests that have not had recent interaction (Out-of-Date) label Sep 13, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically closed because it has been inactive during the last 30 days since being marked as stale.

As author or maintainer, it can always be reopened if you see that carry on been useful.

Anyway, thank you for your interest in contribute ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale: closed Requests closed due to don't have recent interaction (Out-of-Date) label Oct 13, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale: closed Requests closed due to don't have recent interaction (Out-of-Date) stale Requests that have not had recent interaction (Out-of-Date)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant