fix: Move environments and features to test area #3081
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Uffizzi Preview |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3081 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.89% 95.88% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 1039 1035 -4
Lines 30764 30758 -6
==========================================
- Hits 29502 29493 -9
- Misses 1262 1265 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:
Changes
This is the second last wave of moving the test code into a centralized area of the repository. These mostly move the environment tests and merging existing tests together where appropriate.
How did you test this code?
Test it locally as I moved it over. This time there were no logical failures, though there was a set of errors that were due to the
--reuse-dbcommand flag.