fix: API usage alerting in production #3507
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
zachaysan
changed the title
|
Uffizzi Preview |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3507 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.86% 95.86% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 1099 1099
Lines 34282 34376 +94
==========================================
+ Hits 32864 32954 +90
- Misses 1418 1422 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
khvn26
reviewed
Mar 15, 2024
Co-authored-by: Kim Gustyr <[email protected]>
…e-alerting-in-production
…gsmith/flagsmith into fix/api-usage-alerting-in-production
matthewelwell
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:
pre-committo check lintingdocs/if required so people know about the feature!Changes
In order to address #3461 two main issues were handled. First, an incorrectly implemented InfluxDB query was fixed in order to get the full API usage counts in a single scalar. Second, a local evaluation mode Flagsmith client was introduced in order to allowlist organisations into alerting so that any given mistake in the API alerting code won't disrupt too many users.
How did you test this code?
The API usage code was tested against the staging InfluxDB setup with a date range window set to about a year to gather the most amount of data. Thousands of organisations were tested without the same failure once the fix was implemented.
The local evaluation Flagsmith client code was tested locally with settings variables set to appropriate values. During testing an issue with local evaluation cropped up where flags were not present if the method call happened before the local evaluation cache had been set, so this was temporarily worked around with a small sleep on the client's instantiation.