Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chemical rebalance #9942

Closed
4 tasks done
Pnc6lx opened this issue Mar 13, 2022 · 15 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

chemical rebalance #9942

Pnc6lx opened this issue Mar 13, 2022 · 15 comments

Comments

@Pnc6lx
Copy link
Contributor

Pnc6lx commented Mar 13, 2022

Your GTNH Discord Username

No response

Your Pack Version

2.1.2.3

Your Proposal

chemical balance in gtnh is really bad. for example, you use 3A and 4B make 1C, but you can only get 3A and 4B from electrolysis 7C. i want to change it.

Your Goal

rebalance chemical

Your Vision

more balance chemical, maybe less cost in some chain.

Final Checklist

  • I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying I like this change please reconsider adding it will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
  • I understand this change request may not attract enough attention and thus not be implemented.
  • I understand this change request may be rejected due to other community members think it's inappropriate.
  • I believe this feature would make the pack better.
@Pnc6lx Pnc6lx added Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed Suggestion labels Mar 13, 2022
@Pnc6lx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pnc6lx commented Mar 13, 2022

i will start this work if it is approved

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

Yes chemical is broken. I see this because I change all Aluminium to alumina and broke things even more. Go ahead @Pnc6lx and make suggestions or code prs what we need to change .

@Elisis
Copy link
Member

Elisis commented Mar 13, 2022

This is a major change that would severely alter practically every aspect of the pack's balance. Plus, it would significantly change the feel of the mod.

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

Which is good. But yes let’s discuss this on discord

@Pxx500
Copy link
Member

Pxx500 commented Mar 13, 2022

Everything is balanced around this mechanic, it should stay this way even if it feels 'odd'. It also forces player to find veins instead of just synthesizing material from scratch. It could also be said that some processes are just not 100% efficient and that's fine imo

Another matter is the fact that it would take weeks if not months to change everything and it would break many things in the process

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

No worries we made developing the pack since 2014. If it take month no worries but this cant be a reason for not changing stuff.

@Pxx500
Copy link
Member

Pxx500 commented Mar 13, 2022

Imo it's good as it is now, losses are realistic and the fact that you can't just start with anything to get evenything else is quite important

@Pnc6lx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pnc6lx commented Mar 13, 2022

i can remain the loss, but some loss should remove, like electrolysis

@Dream-Master
Copy link
Member

No i start with some key elements like aluminium and silicon

@Dream-Master Dream-Master added Type: Balancing and removed Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed labels Mar 13, 2022
@Pxx500
Copy link
Member

Pxx500 commented Mar 13, 2022

i can remain the loss, but some loss should remove, like electrolysis

Electrolysis loss is a part of the balance, it was meant to be this way

@Pxx500
Copy link
Member

Pxx500 commented Mar 13, 2022

@Dream-Master can you make a poll in discord to see how many people would like to see this changed?

@iouter
Copy link
Contributor

iouter commented Mar 13, 2022

related: #7403 ; #8975

@Pnc6lx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pnc6lx commented Mar 15, 2022

there is what gtce do GregTechCEu/gregicality-legacy#388
and there is gt5u Blood-Asp/GT5-Unofficial#1334

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 3 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Stale Automatically close this issue in 2 weeks if there are no new responses label Jun 13, 2022
@miozune miozune removed the Status: Stale Automatically close this issue in 2 weeks if there are no new responses label Jun 13, 2022
@miozune
Copy link
Member

miozune commented Jul 12, 2022

done: GTNewHorizons/GT5-Unofficial#1062

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants