New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider extending `AbstractTrees` interface to `*Hole`s #65

Open

ReubenJ opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

Member

ReubenJ commented Oct 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

For example, I've found it useful to define

AbstractTrees.children(node::StateHole) = node.children

This is the same way as we've defined it already for RuleNodes in `HerbGrammar.

I'm not sure if it makes sense to define this per concrete type or define it on the abstract type AbstractRuleNode.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

ReubenJ added the enhancement label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment