coqide: rename to coq-platform, update

[krehel]

Important: Do not tick a checkbox if you haven’t performed its action. Honesty is indispensable for a smooth review process.

In the following questions <cask> is the token of the cask you're submitting.

After making any changes to a cask, existing or new, verify:

• The submission is for a stable version or documented exception.
• brew audit --cask --online <cask> is error-free.
• brew style --fix <cask> reports no offenses.

---

• Renames the cask from coqide to coq-platform

• Adds the latest version for both ARM and Intel

• Update URL and livecheck

This update renames the cask and provides many updates. I noticed that coqide had not received an update for many years, and the current repository location was only doing source releases.

There is another repository under the coq organization that is doing binary releases under coq-platform that contains the same IDE with a new name. Therefore a rename has been performed and all Cask aspects updated to account for this.

Currently ARM and Intel versions are out of sync, which requires the on_#{arch} blocks to account for versions.

I'm not an expert on the Coq ecosystem, but this seems like it is equivalent in what is provided.

[krehel]

Currently this is failing the signature verification check, but since this is technically an existing Cask we should override.

[khipp]

I'm fine with overriding the audit for the reasons stated above.

However, I think we should invert the version components to put the IDE version first.

[krehel]

Possibly. I put it this way because version.csv.first is the platform release version, version.csv.second is the Coq language version included in the platform. This seemed like a natural order.

Overall both should be incrementing version numbers so I don't think it'll break either way.

[khipp]

From the release notes for version 2024.10.0:

The MacOS installer is now not only signed, but also notarized.
Note: the MacOS intel installer is work in progress

This should pass the audit once the Intel version has been bumped as well.

On a side note, since the ARM version is signed, do we expect the signing audit to also run for the Intel version?

[krehel]

Hi @Homebrew/cask is there something else I should do here? I think this is good to go. This replaces an outdated version and the version updates are not consistent so I don't think we should wait on an Intel version.