You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for providing access to the UrbanNav-HK-Deep-Urban-1 dataset. I greatly appreciate the availability of this valuable resource for my ongoing analysis.
I am currently working with the GNSS data from this dataset; however, I have encountered a point of confusion. After reviewing the related paper, it is mentioned that the ublox-F9P receiver used both a geodetic antenna and a low-cost patch antenna. Could you kindly clarify which data files in the dataset correspond to each of these antenna types? Specifically, I am wondering whether the data from the geodetic antenna is stored in the file "UrbanNav-HK-Deep-Urban-1.ublox.f9p.splitter.obs".
Thank you in advance for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your interest in our dataset. Yes the geodetic antenna results of F9P are named with "splitter" as it shares the same geodetic antenna with the Novatel SPAN CPT.
Thank you for providing access to the UrbanNav-HK-Deep-Urban-1 dataset. I greatly appreciate the availability of this valuable resource for my ongoing analysis.
I am currently working with the GNSS data from this dataset; however, I have encountered a point of confusion. After reviewing the related paper, it is mentioned that the ublox-F9P receiver used both a geodetic antenna and a low-cost patch antenna. Could you kindly clarify which data files in the dataset correspond to each of these antenna types? Specifically, I am wondering whether the data from the geodetic antenna is stored in the file "UrbanNav-HK-Deep-Urban-1.ublox.f9p.splitter.obs".
Thank you in advance for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: