You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, a SET message has no built-in response. The user must issue a GET command to see if the SET was successful.
This is not good for non-realtime uses of the binary protocol (like LoRaWAN). It would be nice to schedule a SET on the server and receive a GET of the same setting back, or some kind of ACK/NACK
Required steps / Implementation details
Two options:
implement an ACK/NACK response for SET commands
implement add GET response to SET and GET_FULL response to SET_DEFAULT. What happens if the SET fails in this case?
We must also test the robustness of the protocol when "random" values are sent, when a valid setting is set with a wrong value len, ... (We need unit tests for the user_settings_protocol_executor, basically).
Definition of Done
SET command generates some kind of response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
Currently, a SET message has no built-in response. The user must issue a GET command to see if the SET was successful.
This is not good for non-realtime uses of the binary protocol (like LoRaWAN). It would be nice to schedule a SET on the server and receive a GET of the same setting back, or some kind of ACK/NACK
Required steps / Implementation details
Two options:
We must also test the robustness of the protocol when "random" values are sent, when a valid setting is set with a wrong value len, ... (We need unit tests for the
user_settings_protocol_executor
, basically).Definition of Done
SET command generates some kind of response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: