Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to configure which info is printed per iteration #83

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

goerz
Copy link
Member

@goerz goerz commented Sep 24, 2024

Adds the print_iter_info option, which gives access to a greatly increased number of fields. Modifies the default fields to make more sense in the presence of running costs.

@goerz goerz added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 24, 2024
Adds the `print_iter_info` option, which gives access to a greatly
increased number of fields. Modifies the default fields to make more
sense in the presence of running costs.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.00000% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.2%. Comparing base (768f41f) to head (f7dc23d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/optimize.jl 92.6% 8 Missing ⚠️
src/workspace.jl 0.0% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #83     +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage    86.4%   87.2%   +0.8%     
========================================
  Files           6       6             
  Lines         602     676     +74     
========================================
+ Hits          520     589     +69     
- Misses         82      87      +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@goerz goerz merged commit b6b872b into master Sep 24, 2024
5 checks passed
@goerz goerz deleted the print-iter-info branch September 24, 2024 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant