Add hint for unknown node type #804
Conversation
|
Just my 2 cents, I think we should show the information before the node definition, as it might be long and we could miss the explanation. Also, should we use a |
| <Card> | ||
| <CardHeader> | ||
| <CardTitle>Node source</CardTitle> | ||
| </CardHeader> | ||
| <CardBody> | ||
| <CodeBlock> | ||
| <CodeBlockCode>{stringify(model)}</CodeBlockCode> | ||
| </CodeBlock> | ||
| </CardBody> | ||
| <CardFooter> | ||
| <Hint> | ||
| <HintTitle>Node is not a known type</HintTitle> | ||
| <HintBody> | ||
| Configuration properties are not available when the node is not a known type. Delete, or replace this | ||
| node with valid node. | ||
| </HintBody> | ||
| </Hint> | ||
| </CardFooter> | ||
| </Card> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this component is starting to grow too big to have here :), maybe it's time to move it to a dedicated file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sure - moved to separate file
|
I'd rephrase the warning message a bit: Unknow node type The configuration for an unknown node cannot be changed in the configuration form. Please switch to the source code and correct the node type. Another option is to replace the step in the graphical editor but in that case you will probably lose the existing configuration. |
|
Updated - moved to separate file, updated the With updates: |
|
you did not change the headline, did you? |
Missed that the headline was also changed - Updated. |
fix for #803