-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix!: Remove illuminance_lux
#8304
Conversation
Why would you something like this? WHY? It broke every single sensor with a lux sensor I have. Now I have to waste an afternoon changing back all my entities IDs. At least you could have made it so I wouldn't rename (and disable!) pre-existing entities, c'mon! |
The worst thing for me is node-red does not appear to see any illuminance sensor now. So I will be rolling back. |
Try and take a look under the device info, in my case all the lux sensors associated with Aqara devices where disabled.. I had to manually enable them back and then rename their entity IDs to get my automations to work again. |
That's the solution, thank you so much! 👍I also wondered, why all my illuminance entities were gone. |
That was it thanks. |
That did the trick. Thanks! |
@Koenkk I get that this change was made. However, this does not only break integrations because of the changed name, it also breaks integrations beause the values of the two entities are way too different. In my case, I have to change more than 20 integrations because of the different values. This means that I also have to discover the correct threshold values again. I have some Aqara GZCGQ11LM sensors. The previous illuminance values were much more detailed than the lux values. For some reason, it also seemed to be more reliable/consistent. See the screenshot below. Could we at least get the raw value back, perhaps as a new entity? Or is there any way to do this ourselves? |
Let's discuss the |
Why are the values not identical? From a semantics perspective both report illuminance in Lux/lx, but the lower graph shows values about 1/10 of what to expect during a clear winter day in mid-europe? |
I don't get why the values are the same either. But that's why I want to be able to use the values from the top graph, they are much more realistic (and useful) to me. |
Same issue here. When the day breaks my external sensor goes from 4769 lux to 3011 lux, and from 3011 lux to 1 lux in 10 minutes. Before, each step was around 80 lux. |
Where do I find this settings to enable it manually? I use Hue motion sensors. |
illuminance_lux
toilluminance
, this breaks in two ways:illuminance_lux
has been removed and the value ofilluminance
changes. This affects the following devices: 83633205, MOSZB-140, MOSZB-153, EFEKTA_iAQ3, EFEKTA_PWS_Max, EFEKTA_PWS_MaxPro, EFEKTA_eON29wz, EFEKTA_eFlower_Pro, EFEKTA_iAQ, E2134, POK004, POK011, ROB_200-070-0, HK-SENSOR-4IN1-A, AU-A1ZBPIRS, RADON TriTech ZB, TS0601_illuminance_temperature_humidity_sensor_1, TS0202_3, S-LUX-ZB, TS0222_light, THE01860A, TS0222, LCZ030, MIR-HE200-TY, XFY-CGQ-ZIGB, TS0601_smart_human_presence_sensor_1, Y1_IN, ZY-M100-S_1, ZY-M100-S_2, WZ-M100, ZG-205ZL, ZG-204ZM, YXZBRB58, ZY-M100-24G, ZY-M100-24GV2, ZY-M100-24GV3, MTG075-ZB-RL, RT_ZCZ03Z, ZY-M100-S_3, ZG-205Z, 8750001213, HSE2927E, ZB003-X, 07502L, JS-MC-SENSOR-ZB, KK-ES-J01W, KMPCIL_RES005, RTCGQ11LM, RTCGQ12LM, b-parasite, 7A-SS-ZABC-H0, 5AA-SS-ZA-H0, RTCGQ14LM, RTCGQ15LM, ZNCLBL01LM, GZCGQ01LM, GZCGQ11LM, 07047L, 9290012607, 9290019758, 9290030675, 9290030674, 545D6306, CCT595011, ZSS-ZK-THL, 4512770, TERNCY-PP01, MBD-S, CTM_MBD_Dim, 3RSNL02043Z, WB-MSW-ZIGBEE v.3, MS100, USM-300ZB, PIR313-E