Busch-Jaeger 6735/6736/6737: Drop deprecated switch state #8362
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a multi-endpoint device and therefore the state should be prefixed by the endpoint name.
|
@Koenkk I think Z2M 2.0 is a good chance to get this |
|
Thanks, could you also make a PR to update the docs? Target the |
|
OK, I have updated the docs as well: Koenkk/zigbee2mqtt.io#3260 |
Koenkk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since this device has breaking changes in Z2M 2.0 (payload changes) we can use this as a chance to drop the deprecated state as well.
These are multi-endpoint devices and therefore the state needs to be prefixed by the endpoint name (
state_relay). Thestateattribute never worked properly (e.g. it did not update when device was turned on directly).For Home Assistant users there has been a note in the docs for quite a while that the
switchentity needs to be ignored.