Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[GeoMechanicsApplication] A 3D elastic constitutive law is lacking in GeoMechanicsApplication #12814

Closed
markelov208 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12816
Closed

[GeoMechanicsApplication] A 3D elastic constitutive law is lacking in GeoMechanicsApplication #12814

markelov208 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #12816
Assignees
@markelov208

Comments

@markelov208
Copy link
Contributor

Description

While we have GeoLinearElasticPlaneStrain2DLaw and GeoLinearElasticPlaneStress2DLaw are available for 2D, there is no GeoLinearElastic3DLaw.

Currently we use the 3D elastic law from the structural mechanics. However, we need an incremental version to be applied in geo.

Suggested name - GeoIncrementalLinearElasticLaw

Acceptance Criteria

  • The policy for providing the constitutive matrix is extended for 3D
  • 3D law is registered
  • Unit and integration tests are available (multistep, multistage)

Predecessor
#12396
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@markelov208 markelov208

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@markelov208