Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature]: Increase usage of OpenOA #64

Open
Bartdoekemeijer opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[Feature]: Increase usage of OpenOA #64

Bartdoekemeijer opened this issue Feb 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log. v2.0
Milestone
v2.0

Comments

@Bartdoekemeijer
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

OpenOA seems like a very mature tool for basic SCADA analysis and operations. FLASC currently has a set of tools that do very similar things as OpenOA and has minor dependencies on OpenOA, but could be much better integrated. Putting in this as a placeholder/reminder.

Related URLs

https://github.com/NREL/OpenOA
@paulf81
Copy link
Collaborator

paulf81 commented Feb 10, 2023

I'm sure @ejsimley agrees! Something we've started doing in FLORIS we might try here is opening a discussion thread where we can have a discussion (that is saved) on which features it could make sense to migrate

@paulf81
Copy link
Collaborator

paulf81 commented Feb 10, 2023

Started discussion #65

@Bartdoekemeijer Bartdoekemeijer mentioned this issue Feb 27, 2023
Merged
@paulf81 paulf81 added the ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log. label Dec 12, 2023
@paulf81 paulf81 added this to the v2.0 milestone Dec 12, 2023
@paulf81 paulf81 added the v2.0 label Dec 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log. v2.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@paulf81 @Bartdoekemeijer