Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DateNode -> DateTimeOffsetNode & DateNode2 -> DateTimeNode #15297

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hishamco
Copy link
Member

@hishamco hishamco commented Feb 9, 2024

Address @Piedone comment here

Copy link
Member

@Piedone Piedone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So wouldn't you fix DateTimeParserTests too?

@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ public Expression BuildOperation(in BuildExpressionContext context, ConstantExpr
}
}

public class DateNode : OperatorNode
public class DateTimeOffsetNode : OperatorNode
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you check if these don't break Audit Trail admin listing? Since these are indirectly used from DefaultAuditTrailAdminListFilterProvider.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we have a list of OperatorNode in a List that is serialized as Json then it will break.
And we (with Mike) don't remember configuring these for custom json serialization (might have missed it).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this could break anyone, I will close this then

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants