migrate PyArray contructors to Bound API (Part 1)
#416
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The commit message
seems to still contain a stray (As an aside, I really like this commit as I think it is a glimpse of how the bound API will play out simplifying memory-management-remembering-there-is-a-GIL-pool-behind-the-scenes gymnastics throughout the ecosystem.) |
adamreichold
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following #415
This migrates
PyArrayconstructors to theBoundAPI. I created a commit for each constructor migration. To keep the diff reviewable I will split this over multiple PRs. This starts the migration withPyArray::{new, borrow_from_array, from_owned_array, zeros}.(This also reexports
PyArray0Methods, which we forgot in #415)