From ae0a1bbf39d89ea6c3ccc7b5dd5f1e5e415433f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jack Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:50:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update blog post --- .../posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md b/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md index f96761fa7..154d9f302 100644 --- a/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md +++ b/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ held space and time to be self-subsisting entities existing independently of the Leibnizians, who held space and time to be systems of relations, conceptual constructs based on non-relational properties inhering in the things we think of as spatiotemporally related -:::tip +:::tip[Further Reading] The classical presentation of this dispute is in the correspondence between Leibniz and the Newtonian Samuel Clarke, published by Clarke in 1717 after Leibniz's death the previous year; see H. G . Alexander, ed.,[_The Leibniz-Clarke