From d9ef176386bbd973676b61b3898221c49c24b755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jack Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 09:48:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update blog post --- .../posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md b/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md index 16f1a83f5..b236cfcfa 100644 --- a/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md +++ b/src/content/posts/reading-notes-critique-of-pure-reason/index.md @@ -67,4 +67,7 @@ space and time are _empirically real_, they are _transcendentally ideal_, and so the precise meaning of this claim remains subject to debate, in general terms it is the claim that it is only from the human standpoint that we can speak of space, time, and the spatiotemporality of the objects of experience, thus that we cognize these things not as they are in themselves but only as they appear under the conditions of our -sensibility. This is Kant's famous doctrine of __transcendental idealism__ \ No newline at end of file +sensibility. This is Kant's famous doctrine of __transcendental idealism__ + +### Kant's Transcendental Idealism +