Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: refacto megaparse for service #132

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

feat: refacto megaparse for service #132

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

AmineDiro
Copy link
Collaborator

@AmineDiro AmineDiro commented Nov 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Restructure monorepo
  • Create schema from service

chloedia
chloedia reviewed Nov 20, 2024
View reviewed changes
libs/megaparse/pyproject.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libs/megaparse/src/api/megaparse_service.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libs/megaparse_sdk/tests/test_service.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
libs/megaparse/src/api/megaparse_service.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AmineDiro AmineDiro changed the title feat: full refacto wip feat: refacto megaparse for broker Nov 21, 2024
@AmineDiro AmineDiro changed the title feat: refacto megaparse for broker feat: refacto megaparse for service Nov 21, 2024
@AmineDiro AmineDiro marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2024 09:46
@chloedia chloedia merged commit ab9ad7f into main Nov 21, 2024
1 check passed
@chloedia chloedia deleted the feat/broker-megaparse branch November 21, 2024 10:02
This was referenced Nov 21, 2024
Merged
Closed
Closed
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@chloedia chloedia chloedia approved these changes

@jacopo-chevallard jacopo-chevallard Awaiting requested review from jacopo-chevallard

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@AmineDiro @chloedia