You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at the code and the PDF documentation example, it seems the definition of the exponential map that goes from the tangent vector to the SE(2) element differs from that used in GTSAM and presented in [1].
i.e. rotation and translation do not interact. It seems to me then, that the resulting tangent space is that of $\mathrm{T}(2) \times \mathrm{SO}(2)$ and not that of $\mathrm{SE}(2)$?
Is my understanding correct?
This is important to know for specifying the information matrices correctly, they depend on the definition of the exp/log maps.
[1] Sola, Joan, Jeremie Deray, and Dinesh Atchuthan. "A micro Lie theory for state estimation in robotics." arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01537 (2018).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking at the code and the PDF documentation example, it seems the definition of the exponential map that goes from the tangent vector to the SE(2) element differs from that used in GTSAM and presented in [1].
g2o seems to use
i.e. rotation and translation do not interact. It seems to me then, that the resulting tangent space is that of$\mathrm{T}(2) \times \mathrm{SO}(2)$ and not that of $\mathrm{SE}(2)$ ?
Is my understanding correct?
This is important to know for specifying the information matrices correctly, they depend on the definition of the exp/log maps.
[1] Sola, Joan, Jeremie Deray, and Dinesh Atchuthan. "A micro Lie theory for state estimation in robotics." arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01537 (2018).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: