-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BoundsError with DAE system when defining t as a variable instead of parameter #609
Comments
valentinsulzer
changed the title
Defining t as a variable instead of parameter
BoundsError with DAE system when defining t as a variable instead of parameter
Oct 16, 2020
Using |
Is there a reason why discovery is hard in this case? Seems odd to have to label it a parameter. |
This particular issue isn't hard to fix, but I think it could break some assumptions in passes. |
Which passes assume that |
Oh, I did a grep on the source. There seems to be none. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Defining
t
with the variables instead of with the parameters works fine if making an ODE model, but leads to errors if some equations are algebraic.Should an error be raised if t is defined as a variable instead of as a parameter?
Works
Fails
with message
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: