We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When I use cxmefzzi's checkpoint, the input format is as follows:
[question] | [db_id] | [table]: [column], [column] | [table]:... |
But the test results are as follows
easy medium hard extra all
count 248 446 174 166 1034 ===================== EXECUTION ACCURACY ===================== execution 0.754 0.691 0.489 0.386 0.623
====================== EXACT MATCHING ACCURACY ===================== exact match 0.835 0.709 0.448 0.319 0.632
There is a significant difference in performance compared to what was written in the paper. How should I improve it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
When I use cxmefzzi's checkpoint, the input format is as follows:
[question] | [db_id] | [table]: [column], [column] | [table]:... |
But the test results are as follows
count 248 446 174 166 1034
===================== EXECUTION ACCURACY =====================
execution 0.754 0.691 0.489 0.386 0.623
====================== EXACT MATCHING ACCURACY =====================
exact match 0.835 0.709 0.448 0.319 0.632
There is a significant difference in performance compared to what was written in the paper. How should I improve it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: