Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE]: Configurable Random Tree Chopping Limits #93

Open
var1nthon opened this issue Jul 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[FEATURE]: Configurable Random Tree Chopping Limits #93

var1nthon opened this issue Jul 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement A feature or suggestion Priority: Optional

Comments

@var1nthon
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The current configuration for SmoothTimber only allows for a single default block chopping limit. This restricts the flexibility of gameplay and does not account for different tree sizes or types.

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to suggest adding the ability to set the default chopping limit as a percentage of the tree's total blocks or as a list of possible block limits. For example: https://paste.helpch.at/ititonobag.yaml or https://paste.helpch.at/boyuzohide.bash

Describe alternatives you've considered

Currently, the only alternative is to manually set a single default limit, which does not provide the desired level of customization or flexibility for different tree types and sizes.

Additional Information

This feature would enhance gameplay by making tree chopping more dynamic and tailored to different tree types, improving overall player experience.

@var1nthon var1nthon added Enhancement A feature or suggestion Priority: Optional labels Jul 20, 2024
@Lauriichan
Copy link
Member

The chopping limit is in place for performance reasons and does not account for the total amount of blocks a tree would have.
This limit will stay static.
SmoothTimber doesn't detect trees, it detects wood blocks.

About adding percentages per wood type is something that can be thought about though

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement A feature or suggestion Priority: Optional
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants