You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
must have modal asking if user is new or existing, and send to different page depending on it
make note on the verify mnemonic page that the user should refresh the page if they didn't save the backup phrase in last step, and READ & FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY! Could consider more lax UX and just not locking them from going back.
verify the FULL phrase... multiple times users have only correctly saved 11 of 12 phrases (this was already in over a month prior to this request, at least in prod side: bc40ad9#diff-b73fd971951b4448fedf156cdf3399fcbe53e67f4d9442977e46c1584b513673R47) - [ ] OR number the words, to avoid users missing them... however, still not foolproof (could become AND if problems again noted) - [ ] dont let user enter anything that matches the backup phrase for their unlock password, make clearer this is user generated pass (reinvestigating this)
user might use a password from bip39 words, aka not collision resistant, so this may be worse than better
on prompt 7 user was asking if they are done with the process, make clear they may now continue to the rest of the application c1b766a
confused by url, maybe mention in tooltip, website name or change url to website? c1b766a
mixing of nav buttons + verify/confirm etc... may be confusing. Consider hiding them when disabled or reworking it - [ ] providing a QR code hover or save as on backup phrase
prompt/alert regarding nav keys such ash h l enter, maybe identify if pc/keybaord user or non-mobile for this prompt
some users get confused by disabled nav, might be bad non-obvious disable coloring on device/browser
autofocus on inputs for users, some users have trouble clicking them ab4c4c6 - [ ] TAB or some other key to autofocus on current prevalent input on page? Would be useful for pass for key users
superceded by above autofucs - [ ] alert if user is clearly not reading, maybe allow prev on verify, but tell user to make sure they save it... they shouldn't be going back to check
too invasive
if pushback or complaints - [ ] regarding autofocus, as per https://stackoverflow.com/a/57258701 it may affect impaired users, may be useful to add option or choice to disable this somehow upon setup...
minimize choices unless complaints voiced
2020-12-20 priority
add skip button to verification, based on user review. User's have indicated they would normally not do a step like that, as it feels far too cumbersome. Warn users on the reprecussions of a wrong password, and guide them to a page in the docs or the like, where it explains on testing the backup phrase on another device, to get the same srs pass output. Do it via a confirm, requiring confirmation that user understands reprecussions of skipping... and maybe add localStore variable noting this... or consider adding later backup option via quick-start as backport
add a counter to note how many more words must be verified, or a table of words numbered 1 - 12 on a table getting crossed out
consider a step tracker, step 1 of 8 etc..., maybe as a sidebar if not mobile, or just go mobile first and have it in the modal, on header or footer of it... this could cause difficulties when it comes to quick start implementation, as we'd be skipping steps.... so going from step 2 to 8 may seem weird and confuse
Sidebar would still be very nice
These 2 points are smaller solutions to the ultimate problem we may run into, the ultimate solution may be to allow skipping of the initial setup, except for the master password... to be explained in a seperate issue to be linked back here as it will be a heavier feature
add additional advOpt for showing the custom format definitions, or link to docs with it?
consider popover elements, as replacements for the current tooltips style, for benefit of mobile users... or find some other alternative that makes the tooltips work there, without being as invasive as popovers.
make instructions more concise, now that docs page is up, and instead see about linking to docs page, with ? hyperlink, where appropriate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Important
Normal
- [ ] OR number the words, to avoid users missing them... however, still not foolproof (could become AND if problems again noted)- [ ] dont let user enter anything that matches the backup phrase for their unlock password, make clearer this is user generated pass (reinvestigating this)user might use a password from bip39 words, aka not collision resistant, so this may be worse than better
maybe
- [ ] providing a QR code hover or save as on backup phrase- [ ] TAB or some other key to autofocus on current prevalent input on page? Would be useful for pass for key userssuperceded by above autofucs
- [ ] alert if user is clearly not reading, maybe allow prev on verify, but tell user to make sure they save it... they shouldn't be going back to checktoo invasive
if pushback or complaints
- [ ] regarding autofocus, as per https://stackoverflow.com/a/57258701 it may affect impaired users, may be useful to add option or choice to disable this somehow upon setup...minimize choices unless complaints voiced
2020-12-20 priority
These 2 points are smaller solutions to the ultimate problem we may run into, the ultimate solution may be to allow skipping of the initial setup, except for the master password... to be explained in a seperate issue to be linked back here as it will be a heavier feature
feat(ux): provide quick-start option, instead of full forced setup #30
add additional advOpt for showing the custom format definitions, or link to docs with it?
consider popover elements, as replacements for the current tooltips style, for benefit of mobile users... or find some other alternative that makes the tooltips work there, without being as invasive as popovers.
make instructions more concise, now that docs page is up, and instead see about linking to docs page, with ? hyperlink, where appropriate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: