Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

benchmarking JuliaBUGS towards other similar packages #210

Open
sunxd3 opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

benchmarking JuliaBUGS towards other similar packages #210

sunxd3 opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@sunxd3
Copy link
Member

sunxd3 commented Sep 2, 2024

some good targets:

  • Stan
  • "modern" BUGS implementations
    • MultiBUGS
    • JAGS
    • Nimble
@yebai
Copy link
Member

yebai commented Sep 2, 2024

Let's also compare Nimble's capability for programmable inference and code generation (C++) against JuliaBUGS. The programmable inference in Nimble is loosely connected to graph traversal in JuliaBUGS and maps that to different MCMC samplers. programmable inference are probably easier to perform in JuliaBUGS due to the AbstractMCMC interface and also the everything is written-in-Julia property (i.e. avoiding the two-language problem).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants