You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There was previously a bug where the we were correcting for the pileup at zero in significance distributions by plotting the OFF distribution as significance_off[exclusion_mask.data.flatten()]. When a gaussian distribution is fit to this distribution, it is broad (sigma ~ 1.15) and skewed negative (mu ~ -0.1) for several bright point source fields that show nice distributions in ED (Crab, Mrks).
It looks like some of the ON region is leaking into the background a bit.
This might be related to the energy range supplied to the ExcessMapEstimator (I get marginally better results by restricting the range of energies that are accepted), but I'm not sure.
I get identical results with and without bkg smoothing as well, so unrelated to that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There was previously a bug where the we were correcting for the pileup at zero in significance distributions by plotting the OFF distribution as
significance_off[exclusion_mask.data.flatten()]
. When a gaussian distribution is fit to this distribution, it is broad (sigma ~ 1.15) and skewed negative (mu ~ -0.1) for several bright point source fields that show nice distributions in ED (Crab, Mrks).It looks like some of the ON region is leaking into the background a bit.
This might be related to the energy range supplied to the
ExcessMapEstimator
(I get marginally better results by restricting the range of energies that are accepted), but I'm not sure.I get identical results with and without bkg smoothing as well, so unrelated to that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: