You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a better way than generating another fixed (not random) base point by taking original base point's sha256 hash? The hash is not necessarily a valid x coordinate of a point on curve, so we take the hash over and over again until we find such a valid x.
The question is: why we use this method instead of picking a number k and multiply it with original base point to get another base point? Or is that because we want to get a valid base point without revealing the number k?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there a better way than generating another fixed (not random) base point by taking original base point's sha256 hash? The hash is not necessarily a valid x coordinate of a point on curve, so we take the hash over and over again until we find such a valid x.
The question is: why we use this method instead of picking a number k and multiply it with original base point to get another base point? Or is that because we want to get a valid base point without revealing the number k?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: