Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

f_removeFlows sign convention is not intuitive; the function still 'adds' the flows it receives, and it receives negative numbers. #47

Open
GillisHommen opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

f_removeFlows sign convention is not intuitive; the function still 'adds' the flows it receives, and it receives negative numbers. #47

GillisHommen opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@GillisHommen
Copy link
Contributor

Change sign convention for f_removeFlows and modify all function calls to this function. (which is only a few; in profile/consumption/production energy assets.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GillisHommen