Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Confidence should only be there when either fix or affected package is present #1083

Open
Hritik14 opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Confidence should only be there when either fix or affected package is present #1083

Hritik14 opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Hritik14
Copy link
Collaborator

Hritik14 commented Jan 17, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Without a relationship between fixed/affected package to a vulnerability, confidence - by itself - does not provide any value in Inference.
We should have a check against this.

https://github.com/nexB/vulnerablecode/blob/2903edcef68de3137e57f804b022a22b2710c5c8/vulnerabilities/improver.py#L29-L72

Found while writing tests in: #1081
@Hritik14
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related: #701

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Hritik14