Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
148 lines (106 loc) · 7.59 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

148 lines (106 loc) · 7.59 KB

Lighthouse CI Compare Action

GitHub Super-Linter CI Check dist/ CodeQL Coverage

This action helps you to based on the results of running Lighthouse CI, compare the current results with the ancestor commit results.

This comparison can be used to create a Markdown table and a comment on the pull request.

Getting started

Prerequisites

  • You need to have a Lighthouse CI server running.
  • You need to have a Lighthouse CI project created.
  • You need to have a links.json file generated by Lighthouse CI (this action needs to run after the Lighthouse CI action).

Usage

- name: Lighthouse CI Compare
  uses: adevinta/actions-lighthouseci-compare@v1
  with:
    links-filepath: '.lighthouseci/links.json'
    base-url: 'https://your-lhci-server.com/v1'
    project-id: 'your-project-id'
    current-commit-sha:
      ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request' &&
      github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }}
    should-build-fail: true

current-commit-sha: If you are in a Pull Request, you need the github.event.pull_request.head.sha to compare with the commit from which your branch came from, otherwise you can use github.sha.

Inputs

links-filepath

  • Description: The location of the links.json file generated by Lighthouse CI.
  • Required: Yes
  • Default: .lighthouseci/links.json

base-url

  • Description: The base URL of your Lighthouse CI server, for example https://your-lhci-server.com/v1.
  • Required: Yes

project-id

  • Description: The project ID of your Lighthouse CI project. This is a GUID.
  • Required: Yes

current-commit-sha

  • Description: The current commit SHA.
  • Required: Yes

should-fail-build

  • Description: If the action should fail if it crashes.
  • Required: No
  • Default: false

Outputs

markdown

This is a Markdown table with the results of the comparison.

The table looks like this:

URL Performance LCP CLS TBT Link to Report
/ 72/100 🟢 1338 ms 🔴 0.059 🟢 1747 ms 🟢 Report
/maison_jardin/offres 68/100 🔴 2045 ms 🔴 0.048 🟢 2518 ms 🔴 Report
/classified/latest/12 73/100 🔴 1181 ms 🔴 0.002 🟢 1803 ms 🔴 Report

comparedMetrics

This is the object used to create the table. You can use this output to create your own results or programmatically in a different script.

The object looks like the following:

{
  /classified/latest/12:
   { performance:{currentValue:73,previousValue:75,diff:-2,isRegression:true},
     lcp:{currentValue:1181,previousValue:1061,diff:120,isRegression:true},
     cls:{currentValue:0.002,previousValue:0.002,diff:0,isRegression:false},
     tbt:{currentValue:1803,previousValue:1456,diff:347,isRegression:true}},
  /_maison_jardin_/offres:
    { performance:{currentValue:68,previousValue:71,diff:-3,isRegression:true},
      lcp:{currentValue:2045,previousValue:1513,diff:532,isRegression:true},
      cls:{currentValue:0.048,previousValue:0.048,diff:0,isRegression:false},
      tbt:{currentValue:2518,previousValue:2260,diff:258,isRegression:true}},
  /:
    { performance:{currentValue:72,previousValue:72,diff:0,isRegression:false},
      lcp:{currentValue:1338,previousValue:1228,diff:110,isRegression:true},
      cls:{currentValue:0.059,previousValue:0.059,diff:0,isRegression:false},
      tbt:{currentValue:1747,previousValue:1789,diff:-42,isRegression:false}}}

Which includes the URL as the key and the metrics as the value.

status

Tells if the action has failed or not. We are handling this output because there are reasons why this could fail and you might not want to continue the build anyway.

You can also use the directive continue-on-error in your workflow to continue even if this fails, but with this we provide you a way to know if the action has failed too.

See the FAQ section for more information.

failureReason

This is the reason why the action has failed. Is a print of the error message.

FAQ

My build is failing, what can I do?

Known reasons for failure:

  • Build doesn't have an ancestor. This might happen if you don't have properly configured the LHCI_BUILD_CONTEXT__ANCESTOR_HASH in your lhci autorun.
  • The links.json file is not found. This can happen if you are re-running this action manually. If you re-run a job and is the same commit of a previous run, Lighthouse CI will not generate the links.json file again.