You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am working with a sample of RNAseq from Arabidopsis' sperm-cells (SRR7945266 to SRR7945268). This same data was extremely slow to map with Salmon, but Dr. Patro kindly fixed it (COMBINE-lab/salmon#527) and maps around 85%. Now, I need to map to the genome, I trying tweaking the seeding parameters to no avail, I get over 85% on "too short" I'm assuming the aligner is having a similar problem.
Do you think this could be solved in STAR? I'm attaching a few thousand reads of the first library in case they're of any use. sub1.fq.gz sub2.fq.gz
Thanks
-José
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, turns out trimming with fastp -3 -4 -x solved the issue. Sorry again. Never faced such a problem with STAR, to which I usually feed untrimmed reads and works slightly better.
if the fragment insert size is < PE read length, the trimming is important, as the mappable portions of the reads are small and thus they cannot pass the filtering.
Dear Dr. Dobin,
I am working with a sample of RNAseq from Arabidopsis' sperm-cells (SRR7945266 to SRR7945268). This same data was extremely slow to map with Salmon, but Dr. Patro kindly fixed it (COMBINE-lab/salmon#527) and maps around 85%. Now, I need to map to the genome, I trying tweaking the seeding parameters to no avail, I get over 85% on "too short" I'm assuming the aligner is having a similar problem.
Do you think this could be solved in STAR? I'm attaching a few thousand reads of the first library in case they're of any use.
sub1.fq.gz
sub2.fq.gz
Thanks
-José
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: