Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image generation results are easily affected by random seed #14

Open
CodingMice opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Image generation results are easily affected by random seed #14

CodingMice opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@CodingMice
Copy link

CodingMice commented Apr 15, 2024

I got good results using the recommended prompt and seed, but when I used the recommended prompt and random seed I got worse results.
Good Result:
input prompt: a black dog and a white cat
input seed: 15
a black dog and a white cat_1

Bad Result:
input prompt: 10 apples on the table
input seed: 15
10 apples on the table_1
Any solutions?

@thss15fyt
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your interest.

  1. It seems the output image is in wrong BGR instead of RGB. Please check the inference code.
  2. The output results depend on both the text-to-panel and panel-to-image results. In your case, 10 apples are more diffcult for the first stage to properly arrange them. You can try different arrangement using random seed at first, and then run the panel-to-image with satisfying arrangement.

@holytony
Copy link

I got good results using the recommended prompt and seed, but when I used the recommended prompt and random seed I got worse results. Good Result: input prompt: a black dog and a white cat input seed: 15 a black dog and a white cat_1

Bad Result: input prompt: 10 apples on the table input seed: 15 10 apples on the table_1 Any solutions?

I agree, after having tried many times with different prompts and seeds, most of results coming out are not desirable,
generally speaking they still got issues with colours and numbers, I feel like the default demo examples are kinda of cherry picking, hopefully they can release the version they used in the original paper

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants