feat: Add ability to use multiple scopes

[amromusharaf]

This PR adds the oft-requested ability to use multiple scopes, and includes tests. For example:

feat(foo,bar): Add cool new feature

[amannn]

Hey @amromusharaf,

thank you for this excellent pull request! 💯

I only left some minor comments, maybe give them your consideration.

Do you know if other tools like semantic-release support multiple scopes as well? The combination with that tool was at least my initial motivation to build this action. If yes, maybe it's worth mentioning this feature in the README with the validation examples.

Otherwise I'd silently support it the way you've implemented it right now. Otherwise a user might get the impression that this syntax is generally supported.

Thanks!

[amromusharaf]

Hey @amannn -- thanks for your quick response! The changes you've requested sound great; I've pushed them, and I appreciate your thoughtful review :)

As to the question re: semantic-release, I'm unsure whether or not they support multiple scopes, though I'd be a little surprised if they do, as I'm not sure this is part of the official spec just yet. That being said, I noticed it's been requested in a few places, which is why I ultimately ended up opening this PR:

https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#specification
conventional-commits/conventionalcommits.org#302
conventional-changelog/commitlint#75
conventional-changelog/conventional-changelog#232

I think, as you say, it may be best to silently support it for the time being?

Thanks again for your time, by the way -- it's been a pleasure contributing to your codebase :)

[amannn]

I noticed it's been requested in a few places

True, thank you for the links. It seems like commit lint also supports the same syntax already: conventional-changelog/commitlint#901.

I think, as you say, it may be best to silently support it for the time being?

Yep, sounds fair!

it's been a pleasure contributing to your codebase :)

Great to hear! Thank you for your contribution 👏

[github-actions]

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.3.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

[webstoreportal]

any issue in convention of comma separator symbol , with—or without—a trailing space?

[webstoreportal]

any issue in convention of comma separator symbol , with—or without—a trailing space?

---

I remember one CLI tool parsed differently to the other (replacing spaces with hyphen), not sure if the push made it implicitly to the "official spec" https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0-beta.3/

---

has seen adoption from enough tools

---

conventional-changelog/conventional-changelog#232
conventional-changelog/commitlint#901

[amannn]

Not sure about the official convention, but I think we should support spaces in this action:

action-semantic-pull-request/src/validatePrTitle.js

Line 62 in 1829a7c

? result.scope.split(',').map((scope) => scope.trim())