Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specs 1.0 roadmap #532

Open
7 of 34 tasks
torkleyy opened this issue Jan 3, 2019 · 6 comments
Open
7 of 34 tasks

Specs 1.0 roadmap #532

torkleyy opened this issue Jan 3, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@torkleyy
Copy link
Member

torkleyy commented Jan 3, 2019

This is the tracking issue for the 1.0 release.

Alpha phase

Goal: Get the API to a level that's supposedly stable and robust.

Steps

  • Check error handling for consistency
  • Make World an extension of Resources (Make World an extension of Resources #523) (worked on by @TimonPost)
  • Evaluate System::setup (see Discourage custom System::setup #525, System::setup() ergonomics #437) (worked on by @LucioFranco)
    • How much should we keep? (everything / Default only / no automatic setup)
    • Work out good practices
    • Look into initialization story in general
  • RestrictedStorage (worked on by @distransient)
    • Is it actually useful? How applicable?
    • With which APIs does it intersect?
    • Can its uage be improved?
  • Remove common module
  • Remove experimental modules / move them out
  • Allow joining over FlaggedStorage in parallel (worked on by @Moxinilian)
  • Audit uses of unsafe (Audit all uses of unsafe #548)
  • Close, fix or postpone all existing issues
  • Try to cut down on dependencies where appropriate; document public dependencies and stabilize them before the alpha release
  • Migrate to Rust 2018

Reflection

  • Summarize all changes
  • Release alpha version & create post

Beta phase

Goal: Fix last inconsistencies / problems reported, improve docs quality, increase test coverage and create bigger demo.

Fixes

  • Plan eight weeks starting with the post for collecting problem reports.
  • Fix bugs, fix problems / close issues which are out of scope; document what is in scope and what isn't.

Documentation

  • Improve top-level documentation; include only reference-style information and keep all explanations in the book; link to the book when appropriate.
  • Ensure the following items are part of every item (where applicable)
    • # Errors section
    • # Panics section
    • # Examples section

Tests

  • Set up codecov.io to measure code coverage
  • Try to cover uncovered lines where appropriate
  • Add larger simulation test

Demo

  • Create bigger demo with good documentation serving the example, showing best practices, common patterns and general usage
  • Make README example more useful / point to demo

End of beta phase

  • Release beta version and make another post
  • Help a couple of projects upgrading

1.0

  • If nothing goes horribly wrong, release 1.0 and make an announcement.
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 30, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Feel free to comment if this is still relevant.

@stale stale bot added the stale No activity since 60, issue is about to be closed label Mar 30, 2019
@LucioFranco
Copy link
Member

@torkleyy I dont think we want to close this?

@stale stale bot removed the stale No activity since 60, issue is about to be closed label Mar 30, 2019
@ldesgoui
Copy link
Contributor

ldesgoui commented May 18, 2019

Considering the multiple breaking changes, it might be worth adding a "Migrating from 1.0" page in the tutorial as a point in the Beta Phase's Documentation list

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 17, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Feel free to comment if this is still relevant.

@stale stale bot added the stale No activity since 60, issue is about to be closed label Jul 17, 2019
@WaDelma
Copy link
Member

WaDelma commented Jul 18, 2019

Not to be closed

@stale stale bot removed the stale No activity since 60, issue is about to be closed label Jul 18, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 16, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Feel free to comment if this is still relevant.

@stale stale bot added the stale No activity since 60, issue is about to be closed label Sep 16, 2019
@WaDelma WaDelma removed the stale No activity since 60, issue is about to be closed label Sep 16, 2019
@ghost ghost unpinned this issue May 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants