Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve performance of checked kernels on non-null data #2747

Closed
Dandandan opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2749
Closed

Improve performance of checked kernels on non-null data #2747

Dandandan opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2749
Labels
arrow Changes to the arrow crate enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog performance

Comments

@Dandandan
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
There is some low hanging fruit to improve the checked arithmic kernels.

Describe the solution you'd like

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context
@Dandandan Dandandan added enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog performance labels Sep 16, 2022
@Dandandan Dandandan mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2022
Merged
@Dandandan Dandandan changed the title Improve performance of checked kernels Improve performance of checked kernels on non-null data Sep 16, 2022
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Sep 30, 2022

label_issue.py automatically added labels {'arrow'} from #2749

@alamb alamb added the arrow Changes to the arrow crate label Sep 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
arrow Changes to the arrow crate enhancement Any new improvement worthy of a entry in the changelog performance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Speed up checked kernels for non-null data (~1.4-5x faster) Dandandan/arrow-rs
2 participants
@Dandandan @alamb