Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Next release of object_store? #3626

Closed
winding-lines opened this issue Jan 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Next release of object_store? #3626

winding-lines opened this issue Jan 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
development-process Related to development process of arrow-rs object-store Object Store Interface question Further information is requested

Comments

@winding-lines
Copy link
Contributor

Which part is this question about

This is a question about the next release.

Describe your question

I am doing final testing on a Polars PR (pola-rs/polars#6426) that uses the current GCP authentication changes. It would be cleaner if I depended on a released version of object_store instead of a git hash. Do you have an object_store release planned in the next week?

Additional context
@winding-lines winding-lines added the question Further information is requested label Jan 29, 2023
@tustvold
Copy link
Contributor

Will do

@liukun4515 liukun4515 added the object-store Object Store Interface label Jan 31, 2023
@tustvold
Copy link
Contributor

tustvold commented Feb 1, 2023

Release thread - https://lists.apache.org/thread/41d0jy00dzn102bd48tsvf8bf0bqgwow

@winding-lines
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you very much!

@tustvold tustvold added the development-process Related to development process of arrow-rs label Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
development-process Related to development process of arrow-rs object-store Object Store Interface question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@winding-lines @tustvold @liukun4515