Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maven uptime issues impacting Trivy scan availability #1294

Closed
teng1 opened this issue Oct 14, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1511
Closed

Maven uptime issues impacting Trivy scan availability #1294

teng1 opened this issue Oct 14, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1511
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed. triage/support Indicates an issue that is a support question.

Comments

@teng1
Copy link

teng1 commented Oct 14, 2021

Hi,
We currently have trivy scanning as part of a image build pipeline.
We have observed with increasing frequency that Maven is down causing scans to time out, I don't suppose there any approaches we could take to mitigate against Maven uptime affecting Trivy scan availability?

Thanks in advance.

@teng1 teng1 added the triage/support Indicates an issue that is a support question. label Oct 14, 2021
@jackroberts-gh
Copy link

If you dont need the maven/libraries scanning functionality, with v0.20.0> you can use "--vuln-type os" which will only scan the os and not contact the maven site.

See #1191

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been labeled with inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed. label Dec 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and will be auto-closed. triage/support Indicates an issue that is a support question.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants