Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 30, 2023. It is now read-only.

Different results on different OS #10412

Closed
yaroslav-ilin opened this issue Mar 7, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

Different results on different OS #10412

yaroslav-ilin opened this issue Mar 7, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

@yaroslav-ilin
Copy link

Which version of PhantomJS are you using? Tip: run 'phantomjs --version'.
1.4.1

What steps will reproduce the problem?

  1. run phantomjs with this script pastebin.com/iJjgwsqu
  2. look at output

What is the expected output?
As on Windows XP SP3:
D:\phantomjs\my>phantomjs.exe bug-test.js
body size:4360
content length:4360

D:\phantomjs\my>

it finishes ok.

What do you see instead?
on Red Hat Linux:
$ phantomjs ./bug-test.js
Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":99.0".
body size:2718
content length:4360

and it doesn't finish.

Which operating system are you using?
Linux ************ 2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 23 02:21:33 CST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Did you use binary PhantomJS or did you compile it from source?
Looks like our admins have compiled it from source.

Please provide any additional information below.
Page content also differs on different OS, e.g. on Linux I'm receiving

<html><head></head><body></body></html>

curl works fine on the same URL.

Disclaimer:
This issue was migrated on 2013-03-15 from the project's former issue tracker on Google Code, Issue #412.
🌟   3 people had starred this issue at the time of migration.

@ariya
Copy link
Owner

ariya commented Mar 14, 2012

[email protected] commented:

The ad2 URL loaded in the script seems to produce randomized content everytime it's called. Not sure how it's possible to debug this problem.

In general, without a reduced test case (i.e. from a much more detailed analysis than the above report), this is likely going nowhere.

 
Metadata Updates

  • Status updated: Invalid

@ariya ariya closed this as completed Mar 14, 2012
@yaroslav-ilin
Copy link
Author

I've posted more detailed report at #10445

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants