Several questions about Phantom.js. Repost.

[ddfssdfkofdsfighdfuigf]

Since my last issue was rudely closed with a bullshit excuse, I'm reposting it now. I even went through the trouble of asking at Stack Exchange, where I got the same rude response as here. Same thing in your dead chat room. You seem uninterested in answering any questions about the project and ignore everything I type. What is wrong with you?

1. Is Phantom.js dead/dying?
2. Is there really no way to bind a non-default IP address for Phantom.js to use? This limitation is more than just an annoyance -- it's a downright security issue. I'm very surprised and surprised that it is not supported.
3. When you load a webpage in Phantom.js, does it download every element on that page (images, CSS, JS, embedded videos etc.) and then just throw that data away if you don't use it for a screenshot or something? It doesn't store this on the disk at all by default?
4. How secure is Phantom.js? I'm worried that the pages I load will make Phantom.js exploited and cause it to delete files on my server (FreeBSD) or install rootkits or worse. How realistic of a threat is that? I worry about it a lot, especially since FreeBSD doesn't even have the latest version available, even though it's like a year old...
5. Is there a proper "everything has finished loaded fully and all redirections and CloudFlare screens and whatnot have been displayed" function that I can use instead of the practically worthless "onLoadFinished" thing?

[ariya]

There's too much entitlement-tone in this issue. Unfortunately, we can't deal with that.
For more context, see also #14541 and #14548.